Project HopeMonday, January 11, 2010Posted by Ronald Covington Jr., community organizer and director of High Expectations youth initiative, Child First Authority of Baltimore, under Big Visions , Education Post the next comment (2 so far) |
A few years ago I mentored a young man who was 14 years old. He was in an alternative school, reading at a 2nd grade level, and performing math at a 4th grade level. The previous school year he had missed somewhere around 100 days of school for various reasons. He had a loose affiliation with a local street gang that was becoming more influential as the days went on. All things considered, he was a good child but was headed down the path to destruction.
I introduced him to a variety of extra curricular activities including signing him up for an athletic team at the local recreation center. He showed a fleeting interest but was more focused on making money and finding his own path. He was gifted in repairing and making things with his hands and showed a focus and discipline that was refreshing. His school had some opportunities for apprenticeships in skilled labor, but students needed to be a certain age and grade level to participate. The fear for this young man—as it is for so many others in his situation—is that by the time he was eligible he would not be available to participate.
Benjamin Franklin once said “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” The city of Baltimore needs to pilot a program for students like this young man. We could call it Project Hope.
Let’s start with 50 students who meet specific criteria: middle school students who are at least two grade levels behind, have been consistently late and/or truant, have documented and extensive behavior issues in and out of school, and are interested in learning a skilled trade. The students would be supported by mentors who would help facilitate and coordinate their plan of success.
Local businesses would provide training with the incentive of receiving a tax credit based on the number of students who successfully complete the program. The state and local government would provide the subsidy for materials and program costs and assess a special tax to local businesses to provide revenue for the program.
The school system would provide a special academic track for the students. The city office of employment and development would recruit employers to hire students upon successful completion of the program. Students would receive a stipend while training. The amount received would be based on academic and job skills achievement. Students who successfully complete the program would be recognized in the local media and celebrated throughout the community.
If we continue to stand and scratch our heads and keep restating the problem with our young people and don’t act, we are no better than those who lie in wait looking to steal their hope and destroy their futures.



Monday, January 11, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Ronald….Good thinking and eventually the kinds of commonsense approaches to valuing students(People) enough by folks like you will open the gates for change that is truly no child left behind. All children have value and deserve a life…We know all too well the path of non-caring, underachieving, low esteem and few skills has on being prepared for opportunity as a child grows in to adulthood if they ever get there. The cost of your proposal is much less that what we pay at the other end for services, incarceration, and all the other cost for the uneducated. Hats off to you Sir!
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 at 11:34 am
Dear Mr. Covington, if you want to help students improve their reading ability, try TV captions.
Reading, a national problem. As you know, historically our nation has relied on teachers in classrooms to teach reading. But when a third of 4th graders have not learned to read at the basic level and later many of these same struggling students drop out of high school because they can’t easily read their 11th and 12th grade texts, teachers critically need fresh innovative help.
TV captions can help children learn to read. Opening the closed TV captions transforms the ordinary television set into a free reading tutor. TV captions create an unrivalled opportunity for a learner to connect the sound of the spoken word with the sight of the printed word in the context of the picture and the action unfolding on the screen to explain and reinforce the meaning of the words.
The research has been done. Over 25 years of ongoing research validates the concept that seeing the printed TV captions as the words are spoken helps many students learn to read. See research listed on the website http://www.captionsforliteracy.org. Much of this research is published in academic journals of limited circulation. We invite your attention to a recent, well balanced study On-screen print: the role of captions as a supplemental literacy tool by Linebarger, Piotrowski & Greenwood, available online by Googling DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01407.x, and soon to be published by the Journal of Research in Reading.
The federal legislation is in place. Since January 2006 TV captions have been available, by federal mandate, on virtually all network and cable stations and programs, 20 out of 24 hours a day, every day all year long, thanks to decades of lobbying by organizations for the deaf. TV captions can be turned on with a click of the CC button on the remote control or with the use of the television set’s menu.
Who can TV captions help? TV captions can help millions, from toddlers to struggling students to disadvantaged inner city children to high school drop outs to English language learners to low literacy adults.
Can educators afford to waste the millions spent to produce TV captions? Although producers and broadcasters spend millions of dollars a year to provide TV captions, TV captions are absolutely free for viewers. Can we afford to waste the educational value of these expenditures for providing TV captions? Or the 7300 hours a year this priceless free resource is available for reading practice?
TV captions are a supplement, not a substitute, for teachers or families. We know that TV captions are a supplement, not a substitute for classroom instruction by teachers. We know that TV captions cannot substitute for the warmth of a family member reading to a child. But when children don’t learn in school and there is no family member able to read to their kids, where there is only a single parent with two jobs and little free time or where the reading skills of the family are shaky or where a foreign language is spoken at home, TV captions are readily available and tireless.
How to get the most benefit for television that is watched in any event. The point is not for learners to watch more television, but to be sure that the TV captions are turned on whenever they do watch. It may take time for the value of TV captions to be realized and they may not help each and every learner, but even classroom teachers cannot guarantee reading success for 100% of their students.
Many toddlers now watch 2 to 3 hours a day of television and many older kids see television 5 to 7 hours a day. But with TV captions turned on to age-appropriate programs 15 to 50 hours a week, it adds up to hundreds or thousands of hours a year when learners can practice at home connecting the sight of printed TV captions to the sound of the spoken words.
Pediatricians recant prior objections to television. In a March 2009 about face, the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatrics, concluded that “TV viewing between birth and 2 years of age was neither beneficial nor deleterious to child cognitive and language abilities at 3 years of age,” reversing their earlier position that parents should avoid any television viewing for children under the age of 2. In other words, television itself is a neutral medium. Unfortunately, the pediatricians did not evaluate any programs while showing TV captions.
You are in a unique position to spread the word. You are in an ideal position to help mobilize the beneficial potential of TV captions with your network that reaches both parents and teachers. Please tell families and teachers about their ability to use TV captions to practice reading at home and in after school and summer programs.
Feedback. We are especially grateful for your feedback on questions such as your experience telling parents about TV captions, how many children have tried TV captions at home and how effective TV captions are over the long term (several months to a year) in helping children learn to read or read better. Particularly, it would be useful to hear how you would like to see TV captions improved.
Respond to captionsliteracy@hotmail.com